- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 02:09:52 +0200
- To: "Rdf-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
even better idea:
like libby miller did with FOAF, subclassing.
I think its ok to say that a musicsong is a subclass of something, but i
don't know what domain dc:creator has (hm, oops, i think they don't know
either...)
foaf is fine :
<rdfs:Class rdf:about="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person"
rdfs:label="Person"
rdfs:comment="A person.">
<rdfs:subClassOf
rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Person"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#Person"/>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"/>
<owl:disjointWith
rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Document" />
<owl:disjointWith
rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Organization" />
<owl:disjointWith
rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Project" />
</rdfs:Class>
> I'd generally prefer to go further still and define a subProperty of
> dc:creator for use in this context.
> Otherwise you are at best saying that anything to which can
> be a dc:creator
> in any context is an mm:Artist, hence that mm:Artist covers anyone or
> anything that can create a resource, and at worse changing
> the definition of
> dc:creator.
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 20:08:12 UTC