- From: Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@sam-solutions.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:47:49 +0200
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:31:14PM +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I also think that reification seems the appropriate way to do it. > It does not work - see RDF Semantics and its discussion of reification > - it does not quote the triples, which is what is needed. Can you elaborate or provide a reference on what you mean by "quote" and why/how is it needed here? I feel like I'm missing some background: I've read RDF Semantics (that's my favorite RDF spec, in fact), but I still don't see your point. If I am allowed (be the means of reification) to make statements about statements, I can express anything basing, can't I? In the context of context, I can either assert the statement myself, or assert that it is asserted by someone else, and the latter is what I need (or at least can use) reification for. -- Dmitry Borodaenko
Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 11:57:54 UTC