- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:02:03 -0500
- To: <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Le 21 nov. 2003, à 09:25, Leo Sauermann a écrit : > then the URI would be > http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/love#4 hmm I see a potential problem, if you map that to an html file. you can't have id="4", it will be invalid. The other problem is position which can be misleading sometimes. The position issue is resolved by the versioning of wordnet. But even with that, one could think that http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/love#4 is likely to be similar than http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.7/love#4 The problem is that maybe in the version 1.7 a new definition has been added between 1 and 2. And the old 1.6 "4" has become 1.7 "5". just my 2 pbs. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 5 December 2003 20:28:29 UTC