- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:12:00 +0100
- To: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Paul Denning wrote: > > In reply to [1], I suggest one deliverable be a process document by > which the WG determines what is a best practice. > > Also, add reference to the OASIS UDDI Spec TC, which has a concept of > Technical Notes and Best Practices (TN/BP) [2]. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Nov/0055.html > [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/bps.htm > > Paul Thanks. I've included your suggestion in the revised charter: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/public/bp-charter.html Guus > > -- Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 11:16:05 UTC