- From: Stephen Cranefield <scranefield@infoscience.otago.ac.nz>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:33:26 +1200
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
James Cerra (jimbobbs@hotmail.com) wrote: > There seems to be > very little information on the web about transforming UML graphs into > RDF triples [2,3] - and nothing on the inverse relationship. The > purpose is to find a more concise way (relative to the > standard graphic > notation) of representing RDF data that has been validated to an > RDF-schema. James, You might be interested in these papers: Kogut, P., Cranefield, S., Hart, L., Dutra, M., Baclawski, K., Kokar, M. and Smith, J. "UML for Ontology Development", Knowledge Engineering Review 17(1) (2002) 61-64. [ A short overview of various research efforts related to UML and the Semantic Web ] Cranefield, S. "Networked Knowledge Representation and Exchange using UML and RDF", Journal of Digital Information 1(8), http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i08/Cranefield/ (2001) Cranefield, S. "UML and the Semantic Web", in The Emerging Semantic Web, Cruz, I., Decker, S., Euzenat, J. and McGuinness, D. eds. Amsterdam, IOS Press (2002) 3-20 (An earlier version is available at http://www.semanticweb.org/SWWS/program/full/paper1.pdf) - Stephen
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 05:33:22 UTC