- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:55:32 -0700
- To: "Waqar Hasan" <hasan@dbwizards.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000d01c30d10$3ebedf00$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
The answers are: 1. false 2. true 3. false 4. true The relevant taxonomy is Resource Literal Property Statement In this taxonomy, the species are mutually exclusive, but not exhaustive. For further explanation, I'm writing up some notes on subClassOf inferences, which will be available tomorrow at http://rhm.cdepot.net/doc/properSubClassOf.html ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: Waqar Hasan To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 2:33 PM Subject: RDF -- venn diagram for resources, literals, properties, statements? I am trying to understand the Venn diagram for the following sets used in the RDF data model (http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/ Section 5) 1. Resources 2. Literals 3. Properties (proper subset of resources) 4. Statements I suspect the following are true and would appreciate either pointers to what in the spec makes them true or counter-examples: (a) No literal is a resource (b) No property is a statement (c) Some statements are resources others are not. (d) No literal is a statement Thanks, - Waqar Hasan
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2003 18:56:32 UTC