- From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:57:45 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- CC: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Hi Folks, I am a bit stuck on an inference. I want to be able to infer that this document is talking about a SLR: <Camera> <viewFinder rdf:resource="http://www.camera.org#ThroughTheLens"/> ... </Camera> Here is the piece of knowledge that I am trying to use to make the inference: "Only SLRs have a ThroughTheLens viewFinder" When I defined SLR I restricted the value of viewFinder to 'ThroughTheLens', as shown here: <owl:Class rdf:ID="SLR"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Camera"/> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#viewFinder"/> <owl:hasValue rdf:resource="#ThroughTheLens"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class> And when I defined viewFinder I stated that it is a FunctionalProperty and all Cameras have a viewFinder: <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="viewFinder"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;#FunctionalProperty"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Camera"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Viewer"/> </owl:ObjectProperty> Initially, I thought that these two OWL statements were sufficient to allow me to infer for the above instance that the Camera is a SLR. I now believe, however, that it only allows me to infer that it "may" be a SLR. True? What do I need to allow me to infer that the Camera "must" be a SLR? /Roger
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 11:59:10 UTC