Re: URI for language identifiers

Miles Sabin wrote:

> Right. And it illustrates why we can't take the TAG's rumblings too 
> seriously here. On the one hand we have a chunk of the TAG supporting 
> denotation by authority, and on the other hand we have a TAG consensus 
> that deep-linking is OK, hence that denotation by authority is bunk. 
> This is emphatically _not_ a narrowly technical issue, and expecting a 
> useful, consistent and authoritative statement from a technical body is 
> foolish.


Agreed, but see: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Meaning, 
(a normative section). This is getting baked into specifications, so 
I do think this candidate has to be taken seriously, if only to be 
debunked.

Bill de hÓra

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2003 05:57:21 UTC