- From: m batsis <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:42:39 +0300
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>, jeen.broekstra@aidministrator.nl, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi John, Jeen, Thanks for your replies. Ok from what I understand of the spec [1], the default value is rdfs:Class. Your explanation and pointers made this clear; there is no point in two dissjoint ranges. Actually it was rather silly from my part because my two ranges are not dissjoint after all; I was trying to create a measurment toolkit, where objects could be either a resource or a literal; at first i used multiple (two) ranges, rdfs:Resource and rdfs:Literal. But I can just use rdfs:Class (which is the superclass of rdfs:Literal) and get over with it :-) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_range Thanks again, Manos
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 07:36:06 UTC