- From: Zhang Jeff <jeffzhang726@yahoo.com.cn>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:28:38 +0800 (CST)
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
--- Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> 的正文:> > > > I had assumed that all predicates must be named by > some uriref - this > > seems obvious where a predicate appears in a > simple s o p triple. > ... > > But today I thought of another possible counter > example (where we are > > dealing with reification) that may actually make > sense in some > > circumstances. > > Actually, there are lots of times when it makes > sense to have arcs > without URIRef labels, even without reification. > Two that come to > mind are Currying and using properties when you only > know their > unambiguous properties. If you really want it, why not use an instance of "http://www.w3.org/...#Property" which is just a property without any specific meaning? OR introduce an "anonymous property",into RDF vocabulary? OR in application level,such as "http://www.mycompany.com/unknowProp" typed as rdf:Property ? It is easy to deal it as a "general property" in application level. (I don't have much knowledge of AI or theories of models or math and I just can not see the complexity of this problem. Is it really so difficult? ) And,is there any similar concepts in logics or relation algebra or other knowledge representations? > > > Is this allowable/ make sense? If affirmative - > then a property need not > > have a uriref? > > It makes perfect sense, but as far as I know it is > not legal in RDF > M&S or in the new RDF Core WG drafts. This bothers > some of us, but > there are trade-offs. I write my code to not rely > on this artificial > restriction, but maybe there are good reasons to > rely on it. > > > BTW - "Property" and "predicate" appear to be used > interchangeably - are > > they the same concept? > > As I understand it, a Property object acts as a > predicate in an RDF > statement. I can kind of imagine using a Property > as something else, > or using something else as a predicate, but I think > the distinction > seems to cause more confusion than it's worth. > > -- sandro > > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 新鲜到底,娱乐到家 - 雅虎推出免费娱乐电子周报! http://cn.ent.yahoo.com/newsletter/index.html
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2002 21:28:40 UTC