- From: Narahari, Sateesh <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 15:11:44 -0600
- To: "'Seth Russell'" <seth@robustai.net>, Seth Ladd <seth@brivo.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Just to throw in one more into the mix. ws-security[1] also uses sha1, MD5 name spaces for identifying the algorithms. Take a look at the the spec and the first example in it. for ex: http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1 The bigger question is, who is going to develop an mapping for all these various schemes to identify MD5 and SHA1 ?. Its a mesh already :-) Regards, Sateesh http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-secure/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Seth Russell [mailto:seth@robustai.net] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:49 PM > To: Seth Ladd; www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Re: Where to find RDF Schema for MD5/SHA1/etc? - Or - Public > Schema archive? > > > > From: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net> > > > We're developing our RDF Schema, and need to start describing things > > that are securely hashed via schemes like MD5 and SHA1. > Before we go > > about creating out own URIs for this types of things, I'd > like to ask if > > anyone has already done this. No sense reinventing the wheel here. > > There is > <http://infomesh.net/n3/2001-12-crypto.n3> > Is that the kind of thing you want? > > > Which leads me to a bigger question: are there any public RDF Schema > > archives out there I can search? > > I'm working on one, but it's in early phase of development > and is in Quads > format: > > <http://robustai.net/sailor/semdocs.quads> > > You can surf it with a sailor agent: > > <http://robustai.net/sailor/> > > >There are some very common concepts > > that must appear over and over (such as MD5 encoded > literals) that could > > benefit from using the same URIs in RDF. > > Actually the file above was in context of Sean Palmer's n3 files > > <http://robustai.net/sailor/infomeshn3files.quads> > > .. I found it because I remembered he was working with MD5, > so i surfed to > his context and there it was. > > > Seth > > ... hi ... too bad .... appears I'm not the only Seth on the > semantic web :( > > Seth Russell > >
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 17:12:34 UTC