- From: m batsis <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:38:49 +0300
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Saturday 26 October 2002 00:04, Sandro Hawke wrote: > One of the most > unfortunate ramifications is that term-reusers have to accept all the > assertions in the "definition" whether they are "definitional" or not, > because we can't really distinguish between the two. ...in our use of human language; it comes so natural that we don't need to. We use indirect meaning all the time though. The point here is, do we want to at least distinguish whether x is mentioned as an indirection (whatever that means)? May become usefull at some point. Plus the distinction will allow an application to ignore these rules if it wishes anyway. Cheers, Manos
Received on Saturday, 26 October 2002 12:33:51 UTC