- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:48:30 +0100
- To: <nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "'www-rdf-interest Mailing List'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> Nick Gibbins > > Absolutely not; I'm fully in favour of expressing RSS itself > in RDF (as in RSS 1.0), and regard the RDF-free RSS 2.0 as a > bit of a retrograde step. I agree (more than a bit). > However, I question whether the use of DC-in-RDF [1] elements > in a document which is not an RDF document can really be said > to be a use of RDF per se, especially given that the element > names are identical to those used in a 'pure' XML encoding of DC [2]. Fair point. Bill de hÓra -- Propylon www.propylon.com
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 08:50:11 UTC