- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 23:22:21 +0200
- To: "Uche Ogbuji" <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>, "Seaborne, Andy" <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'Patrick Stickler'" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>properties(@"x:spam") >@"x:spam" - properties() -> * Another good reason for an RDF QL in RDF! Seriously though, I do think such a QL would be extremely useful, not only because it would generally help interop. It would also mean that a whole range of common expressions could become easier in RDF (without having to drop into DAML-land), and also make things like XSLT-ish transformations a lot more straightforward. Not unrelated to the interop point, the ability to save sets of queries in a common format like RDF/XML has to be a plus - same parser etc etc. Cheers, Danny.
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 17:29:38 UTC