- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:16:53 +0100
- To: "RDFInterest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
(Changed forum from jena-dev) Dan Brickley > Yup, using rdf:about='' within RDF documents as a syntactic > convention for > self-reference was something that I proposed back in the old > Model'n'Syntax WG and have been using ever since. Assuming > there's a base > URI it's a handy trick and fits OK with RFC 2396. In the RDFPic case, > where images with this embedded RDF might be floating around the net > without an obvious base URI, it might not be quite right. > In RDF2 we could convert rdf:about="" into a bnode, and then have #frags as links between bnodes and other bnodes. e.g. allow any unicode string as a property name having extension linking a resource with an absolute uri to a resource having the appropriate uri-ref e.g. <http://exampl.org/> "foo" <http://exampl.org/#foo> . (by definition) then if we have no base rdf:about="" translates to a bnode _:doc and rdf:about="#foo" translates to _:x and the triple _:doc "foo" _:x . This would allow the about="" convention and rdf:ID to all work in the absence of a base URI. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 08:19:04 UTC