- From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 21:00:07 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
[Aaron Swartz] > On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 04:24 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > > A bNode is a sub-part of an RDF description. Wanting to refer to the > > bNode > > (as against the thing it represents) is like wanting to refer to the " > > or > > ' characters around some XML attribute. > > Oops, sorry, I want to refer to the thing it represents. Sorry if that > wasn't clear. > You have to be able to have bnodes. They go along with the duality in defining things - by intension or by extension. Bnodes correspond to knowing a thing by its properties. This is another place where templates could be useful. "I'm referring to that instance of 'email-address-template' that's attached to the node for Joe" Cheers, Tom P
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 20:59:40 UTC