- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:03:35 +0100
- To: "'Graham Klyne'" <GK@ninebynine.org>, "'Aaron Swartz'" <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Graham > Klyne > > My own intuition is that a query language for RDF should aim > to operate at > a higher level than "find this pattern of triples", but in my > implementation it was hard to break away from. I'd like to > see more work > on storage formats before we nail down a query language. I agree; the RDF equivalent of find is plenty of innovation for the time being. Otoh simple associative matching is powerful enough for a lot of work, cf Linda. Bill de hÓra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBPOzopuaWiFwg2CH4EQIb7QCfaK6wdVhkDqB92pvoZlCoA0QtMzYAniZt OdM/18tHrseVGPrgzuImvCiP =BMsf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 09:05:49 UTC