Saturday, 29 June 2002
Friday, 28 June 2002
Thursday, 27 June 2002
Wednesday, 26 June 2002
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- RDF-WordNet: representation issues
- RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
Tuesday, 25 June 2002
- RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- RE: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Call For Papers: Information and Knowledge Engineering Conference (IKE-2003)
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Query and Rule languages use cases and survey
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Query and Rule languages use cases and survey
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Datatype question
- The insiders look -- eBay and . . . 18010
Monday, 24 June 2002
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Why is RDF such a tough sell?
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Datatype question
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Scope/Context specific run-time selection of Assertions
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Re: Datatype question
Sunday, 23 June 2002
- Datatype question
- Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ]
- Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ]
Saturday, 22 June 2002
- Re: Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia
- RE: Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia
- Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ]
- "rdf rules"! (and rdf query)
- Re: Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ]
- Re: Report of ad hoc Query/NetAPI meeting at ISWC/Sardinia
- Using entities [was Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)? ]
Friday, 21 June 2002
- RDF Schema for International "Physical" Addressing?
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Re: Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Implementing statement grouping, contexts, quads and scopes (was: Re: Out of context, in context, out of subject ????)
- Out of context, in context, out of subject ????
Thursday, 20 June 2002
- ECML/PKDD Semantic Web Mining: Call for Project Descriptions
- Re: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings
- RE: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings
- Re: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings
- RE: Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings
- Challenge? Using RDF in "real" surroundings
Wednesday, 19 June 2002
Tuesday, 18 June 2002
- Re: Topic Map RDF vocabulary
- Re: New tool to convert delimited text files to RDF
- Re: Topic Map RDF vocabulary
- Topic Map RDF vocabulary
- Empirical comparison of RDF and Topic Maps
- ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v0.9.5 Released
Monday, 17 June 2002
Sunday, 16 June 2002
Saturday, 15 June 2002
Friday, 14 June 2002
Thursday, 13 June 2002
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XMLNamesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XMLNamesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)?
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
Wednesday, 12 June 2002
- ANN: Versa spec, tutorial updated
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
Tuesday, 11 June 2002
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Latest version (1.3) of RDF Web Scraper available
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RDFX: My "vision" for an RDF/XML serialization, for both assertions and queries (RDF 2.0)?
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
Monday, 10 June 2002
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Multiple rdf:type elements
- Surprising/Impressive/Satisfying RDF mindshare at XML Web Services One
Sunday, 9 June 2002
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- New release of FLORA-2
Saturday, 8 June 2002
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland RDF Application Framework 0.9.11
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Announcement: Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit 0.9.5
- Hspace
Friday, 7 June 2002
- Du programme.
- Automated reply from paulhh@www.snatzo.com
- Defining the metadata:subTitle
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Multiple rdf:type elements
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need )
- Re: Re[2]: Resume schema in RDF
- Re: Universe
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
Thursday, 6 June 2002
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- RE: XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need )
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Stock Quotes in RDF
- RE: Multiple rdf:type elements
- Re: Multiple rdf:type elements
- Re[2]: Resume schema in RDF
- RE: Multiple rdf:type elements
- Multiple rdf:type elements
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Names and/or (concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)
- Monadic predicates in RDF
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Universe
- Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: Question (RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages))
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Resume schema in RDF
- Re: Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Question (RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages))
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- RE: SubClassOf vs Child Element
- SubClassOf vs Child Element
- "ҿǹɴ"
- Resume schema in RDF
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
Wednesday, 5 June 2002
- Re[2]: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- [ANN] Catalogue 3.1: gathering metadata, building HTML/XML/RDF reports
- Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics asRDFschemas versus Web pages)
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- INVESTMENT OFFER
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDFschemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
Tuesday, 4 June 2002
- RE: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Modelling Resumes in RDF(S) - work in progress
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- RE: Innovation, community and queries
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need )
- Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- XML vs. RDF vs. N-Triples vs. N3 vs. CSV saga is up again (was: Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need )
- Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Toss NTriples -- RDF Reification is all we need (was Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
Monday, 3 June 2002
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Give This One A Chance, You Will Be Glad You Did.
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- RE: N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- N3 and N-Triples (was: RDF in HTML: Approaches)
- Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy (Was Re: Representing DCMI semantics as RDF schemas versus Web pages)
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- [OT] Broken browsers
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- Re: Innovation, community and queries
- RE: RDF in HTML: Approaches
- Re: RDF in HTML: Approaches