R: rdf patent discussion (repost)

Hi,

I definitely agree with Dan.


Franco Salvetti

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
A: www-rdf-interest@w3.org <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Data: venerd́ 19 luglio 2002 9.55
Oggetto: rdf patent discussion (repost)


>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>I have nothing to say on the topic of RDF patents that I
>didn't say last time[1], and discourage RDF IG members from
>revisiting such a dull topic on this otherwise interesting list.
>I hope people find something more interesting to talk and read
>about...
>
>Dan
>
>(who has no intention of reading about or discussing anyone's
>RDF-related patent claims)
>
>
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jan/0076.html
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iD8DBQE9N8psPhXvL3Mij+QRApTjAJwJkVxwBeQmXHWZWKnpcod61tL2LwCgjeQK
>RA58SqtDJvtZD13VSchpYaI=
>=DssR
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Received on Friday, 19 July 2002 03:59:22 UTC