- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:57:57 +0100
- To: giles.hogben@jrc.it, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- > From: Giles Hogben > I don't agree here. I think what you are saying is circular. > What is a "statement that something is true" if it does not > contain some > notion of belief. Personal view, I'd say that involved two assertions. 1. I assert that that can contains beans. 2. I am a worldAuthorityOnBakedBeans. The first makes the assertion, the second states with what authority I speak. My 0.02Euros. regards DaveP ******** snip here ************ - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 04:59:29 UTC