- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:44:42 -0500
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello world,
I've been fiddling with RDF recently to build a few little graphviz
diagrams. I'm reasonably comfortable using logical inference to deduce
properties with statements of the form
{ :p :someProperty :s } log:implies { :s :someOtherProp "foo" }
but I claim no deep knowledge of RDF.
For my most recent toy, I want to do something more complex and I
can't get my head around it. The short question is, how do I express
"not" in an RDF rule.
The longer question is:
Suppose I have three nodes, :p, :s, and :t. I want to express the
following rule:
If :p :pointsTo :s
and :p :pointsTo :t
and not(s :pointsTo :t)
then :p :hasEdge :t
Graphically, I'm trying to avoid a bunch of extraneous edges. Given
[p]----------------->[t]
| ^
+---->[s]------------+
I want to simply graph:
[p]------>[s]------->[t]
I hope that makes something resembling sense. :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | One's never alone with a rubber duck.
XML Standards Engineer |
XML Technology Center |
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 14:46:11 UTC