- From: <benhood@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:51:43 +0100 (MET)
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <jena-dev@yahoogroups.com>
Hallo, I was wondering if there was some generic way of expressing "belongsTo" between concepts. I have been repeatedly joining two concepts together, that don't have any rdfs:subClassOf or rdfs:subPropertyOf relation, say for example members of a club/family/organisation vocations as members of a union planets belonging to a solar system possesion of goods/items/qualities/skills/experience These concepts appear to me to have no hierarchial relationship and just defining the group as list of its members doesn't seem to do justice to my conceptual understanding of the entity "group". daml:oneOf seems to do the job in a number of situations, ie >>> for oneOf(C, L) read everything in C is one of the things in L; but I don't think it hits the nail of the head. Does anybody else think one should generalize the concept of belonging to something, or I am just missing the point? Thanks Ben
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 09:52:16 UTC