- From: Jeff Barr <jeff@vertexdev.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 00:39:16 -0500 (EST)
- To: <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>, <jeff@vertexdev.com>, <edd@xml.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi All, I have posted the text of the letter within my Patent Wiki. Enter at http://www.vertexdev.com/patent_wiki/index.php?page=PatentWiki, then head to the MainPage. I'm trying to prevent the information within this site from being used by the bad guys, hence the agreement on the front page. Jeff; > on 1/2/02 4:30 PM, Uche Ogbuji at uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com wrote: > >> To start the New Year on a toasty note, I received a bulky Fedex from >> a Terry K. Qualey at an IP law firm. > > Hi all, > > I'm saddened to hear this, but I hope that I can provide some help. I > have a non-lawyer friend who is very knowledgable about patent law, > especially software patents. He understands RDF reasonably well, and > has offered his help in this matter. > > I'd be interested if you could provide more information on the letter > they sent. Was it phrased agressively (i.e. did they threaten to sue?) > and what were the licensing terms they offered? From what you wrote, > they don't sound all that serious -- probably just wanted to see who > they could easily scare into licensing. > > My friend suggested that the best thing to do was to send them a letter > saying that you would investigate their claims, and get back to them > later. You could potentially ask for a claim chart with details on how > your product infringes on the patent. Since I'm sure all of us are very > busy people, it may be a bit of time until you can get back to them > about the issues. > > My friend also said he'd take a look at the patent and see if there > were any obvious holes, etc. However, it doesn't seem like these folks > are too agressive yet. If that changes, he suggested a number of > possible ways to move forward. > > Live from London, > - Aaron
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 07:44:13 UTC