- From: Judson, Ross <rjudson@managedobjects.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 20:33:05 -0500
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <2FB1B00B4354D511A54D00B0D0E946A60108C550@momail.mosol.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:37:39 -0500 (EST) X-Envelope-From: www-rdf-interest-request@tux.w3.org Wed Jan 2 16:36:52 2002 Received: from tux.w3.org (tux.w3.org [18.29.0.27]) by www19.w3.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA27449 for <www-rdf-interest@www19.w3.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:36:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from momail.mosol.com ([64.241.142.197]) by tux.w3.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08690 for <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:36:51 -0500 Received: by momail.mosol.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <Z0TZ61NF>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:34:44 -0500 Message-ID: <2FB1B00B4354D511A54D00B0D0E946A60108C550@momail.mosol.com> From: "Judson, Ross" <rjudson@managedobjects.com> To: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> It is also obvious that the internal workings of any LISP system correspond rather exactly to the patent in question. Atoms (endpoints) are bound into lists (bonds), in any combination desired. Atoms can participate in any number of lists (bonds). Binary and N-ary relations are possible. The LISP model is totally fluid, which is the whole point of this patent. Any LISP interpreter serves as adequate prior art for that portion. The ability to refer to external items needs further study. Were there any distributed LISP-based systems in 1994? I'd be shocked if there weren't. RJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2002 20:33:45 UTC