www-rdf-interest@w3.org from January 2002 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2002

• Introduction to DAML: Part I, by Ouellet and Ogbuji Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Thomas B. Passin
• Re: RDF query language Libby Miller
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Alberto Reggiori
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Libby Miller
• RDF query language gt77@gmx.at
• Re: Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Geoff Chappell
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Jeen Broekstra
• RE: Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Seaborne, Andy
• RE: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

• Re: Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Andrei S. Lopatenko

Thursday, 31 January 2002

• Take 2: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Patrick Stickler
• RE: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Patrick Stickler
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? David Allsopp

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Thomas B. Passin

Thursday, 31 January 2002

• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Ora Lassila

Wednesday, 30 January 2002

• Research Topic -- Data Extraction and RDF Tim Chartrand
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Norman Walsh
• "AGENTS for BUSINESS AUTOMATION" HP for-Mailing-Lists
• Re: how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Geoff Chappell
• how does existing RDF software handle this datatypes test? Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF API... Alive? Brian McBride
• Profium SIR extractor demonstration Janne Saarela
• RE: XML Schema formal mapping of QNames to URIs Manos Batsis

Tuesday, 29 January 2002

• Re: Long desc techniques - what is the url pointing to? Charles F. Munat
• XML Schema formal mapping of QNames to URIs Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• name that URI #2 Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDFCore Update David Allsopp
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• Re: name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
• RE: Anonymous predicate Danny Ayers
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
• RDF API... Alive? Roman Elizarov
• name that URI was: Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden

Monday, 28 January 2002

• Re: Anonymous predicate Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Anonymous predicate Sandro Hawke
• Anonymous predicate Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? David Allsopp
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? by way of
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler
• Fwd: An RDF Schema for P3P published! Brian McBride
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 27 January 2002

• Re: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jonathan Borden
• Re: Expressing "not" in RDF rules Jonathan Borden
• Re: Expressing "not" in RDF rules Sean B. Palmer

Saturday, 26 January 2002

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Expressing "not" in RDF rules Will Sargent

Friday, 25 January 2002

• RE: RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jeremy Carroll
• RDFCore WG: Datatyping documents Jeremy Carroll
• CALL FOR PAPERS and PARTICIPATION: Business Agents and the Semant ic Web (BASeWEB) Said Tabet
• Book with annotations chapter Danny Ayers

Thursday, 24 January 2002

• AAAI'02 Workshop on Meaning Negotiation (fwd) Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 23 January 2002

• Expressing "not" in RDF rules Norman Walsh

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• Re: belongsTo Andrei S. Lopatenko
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Uche Ogbuji
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: belongsTo Andrei S. Lopatenko

Monday, 21 January 2002

• Re: belongsTo Andrei S. Lopatenko

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Dave Beckett
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Dave Reynolds

Monday, 21 January 2002

• Re: belongsTo Andrei S. Lopatenko

Tuesday, 22 January 2002

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Brian McBride
• Re: RDFCore update Patrick Stickler
• Re[2]: belongsTo Leonid Ototsky
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Arthur Barstow

Monday, 21 January 2002

• RE: Question about ARP warning messages Jeremy Carroll
• Fw: Question about ARP warning messages MParmelee
• Re: belongsTo Chris Mungall
• Re: RDFCore update Aaron Swartz
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Roland Schwaenzl
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? David Allsopp
• RE: Common RDF parser bug? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Roland Schwaenzl
• Re: Common RDF parser bug? David Allsopp
• RE: Common RDF parser bug? Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 20 January 2002

• Re: Common RDF parser bug? Sandro Hawke
• Detailed introduction to Versa Uche Ogbuji

Saturday, 19 January 2002

• Common RDF parser bug? Arthur Barstow
• RE: [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping Danny Ayers

Friday, 18 January 2002

• [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping Leo Obrst
• [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping Leo Obrst
• [Fwd: Ontology mapping] Re: model-model mapping Leo Obrst
• Re: RDFCore update Enrico Silterra
• belongsTo benhood@gmx.net

Wednesday, 16 January 2002

• Some recent Internet Drafts relating to RDF/KR/SW/etc. Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 15 January 2002

• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Uche Ogbuji
• RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion dehora
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Graham Klyne
• ANN: Jena 1.3.0 released with persistent storage in relational da tabases Seaborne, Andy
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Thomas B. Passin
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Uche Ogbuji

Monday, 14 January 2002

• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Barstow Art (NMP/Boston)
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• RDFCore update Brian McBride

Friday, 11 January 2002

• RE: Graph data anyone? Danny Ayers
• ISWC 2002 2nd and Final Call for Papers Ian Horrocks
• Re: Graph data anyone? Thomas B. Passin
• Too simple, but maybe useful Henry S. Thompson
• Graphotron and RDF Miloslav Nic
• RE: Graph data anyone? Danny Ayers
• Re: Graph data anyone? Thomas B. Passin
• AGENTS for BUSINESS AUTOMATION by way of
• Re: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property Frank van Harmelen
• AW: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property Wolf Siberski
• RE: Graph data anyone? Danny Ayers
• RE: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property Manos Batsis
• Snowflake schemas and RDF? Hutchison, Nigel
• Re: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property Arjohn Kampman
• Re: Graph data anyone? Andrei S. Lopatenko
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Uche Ogbuji

Thursday, 10 January 2002

• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Jonathan Borden
• Encoding metadata for distributed resources using rdf Shahan perera
• Re: semantic annotation of XML docs Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• Re: robots.rdf Mark Nottingham
• RE: extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property Ron Daniel
• RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Jeremy Carroll
• ANN: RDF to SVG tool Danny Ayers
• Re: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Uche Ogbuji
• extend rdfs:Class & rdf:Property Alexaki Sofia
• semantic annotation of XML docs oliver fodor
• RE: robots.rdf Manos Batsis
• Re: robots.rdf Chris Croome
• RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Jeremy Carroll
• EKAW 02: Extension of WS and tutorial deadline by way of
• Announcement: Workshop on E-Services and the Semantic Web (ESSW2002) by way of
• RE: robots.rdf Massimo Marchiori
• Re: robots.rdf Thomas B. Passin

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• RE: robots.rdf Danny Ayers
• Re: robots.rdf Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: robots.rdf Chris Croome
• Re: robots.rdf Dan Brickley
• Re: robots.rdf Chris Croome
• Re: robots.rdf Massimo Marchiori

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• Re: Alertbox: Site map usability (fwd) Chris Croome

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• ISWC: Call for tutorials asun Gomez-perez

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• RDF patent discussions Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 9 January 2002

• Re: Graph data anyone? Andrei S. Lopatenko

Tuesday, 8 January 2002

• Re: robots.rdf Chris Croome
• RE: Alertbox: Site map usability (fwd) dehora
• Graph data anyone? Danny Ayers

Monday, 7 January 2002

• Alertbox: Site map usability (fwd) Dan Brickley
• CFP: WWW-2002 Semantic Web Workshop Martin Frank
• robots.rdf Danny Ayers

Saturday, 5 January 2002

• From the tragicomic to the merely comic (WRT RDF & Patents) Uche Ogbuji
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Mark Nottingham
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Jonathan Borden
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Mark Nottingham

Friday, 4 January 2002

• Re: XML Europe 2002: still time to submit an abstract... Edd Dumbill
• XML Europe 2002: still time to submit an abstract... Dan Brickley
• Re: aboutEachPrefix? was Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Jonathan Borden
• Re: Identifying reals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Identifying reals Mark Baker
• Re: Identifying reals Mark Baker
• Re: Identifying reals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Sean B. Palmer
• RE: Identifying reals Miles Sabin
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Baker
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Manos Batsis
• Identifying reals Mark Baker
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Patent threat over RDF? Shelley Powers
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Miles Sabin
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Manos Batsis
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Baker
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Miles Sabin
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Manos Batsis
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Miles Sabin
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Baker
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Birbeck
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Baker
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Miles Sabin
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Baker
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Miles Sabin
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Birbeck
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Mark Birbeck
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Manos Batsis
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Jeff Barr
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 3 January 2002

• RE: RDF specifications Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: RDF specifications Graham Klyne
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Graham Klyne
• RE: RDF specifications Graham Klyne
• RE: Patent threat over RDF? Judson, Ross

Wednesday, 2 January 2002

• Re: Don't succumb to FUD Re: Patent threat over RDF? Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Aaron Swartz
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Sandro Hawke
• Don't succumb to FUD Re: Patent threat over RDF? Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Seth Russell
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Patent threat over RDF? Peter Crowther
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Jonathan Borden
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter Crowther
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Patrick Durusau
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Jonathan Borden
• RE: Patent threat over RDF? Shelley Powers

Tuesday, 1 January 2002

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Uche Ogbuji

Wednesday, 2 January 2002

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Frank Manola
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Dan Brickley
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Mark Baker
• Re: what RDF is not (was ...) Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 1 January 2002

• Re: Patent threat over RDF? Uche Ogbuji

Wednesday, 2 January 2002

• Patent threat over RDF? Uche Ogbuji
• RE: what RDF is not (was ...) Peter Crowther
• SV: what RDF is not (was Re: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working Draft published) Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI

Sunday, 23 December 2001

• Re: what RDF is not (was Re: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working Draft published) Jeremy Carroll

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 12:00:33 UTC