- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:38:52 -0000
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sandro:- > > Is anyone doing XML processing by turning XML instances > > into infoset RDF graphs, processing the RDF graphs? Jon:- > There are no semantics attached to XML _itself_ rather > specifications attach semantics to a particular XML grammar > e.g. RDF/XML, Indeed. However, I have been investigating representing constraints upon the infoset items using RDF, and the results seem rather promising - for example in the field of testing XML languages for accessiblity. Because syntactic schemata are simply constraints on the structure of particular infoset instances, I thought it would be a good idea to try to represent these syntactic constraints in RDF, and then apply semantic constraints on top of that. More information is available in:- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Feb/att-0003/01-in dex - Sands: Syntax and Semantics for XAG XAG is the XML Accessibility Guidelines: this document was originally prepared for WAI PF; for testing accessibility of XML languages, but it encompasses a lot of other things too. TAG may also be interested. Cheers, -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2002 18:39:54 UTC