- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:51:34 -0800
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
- CC: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, RDF-Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Richard H. McCullough wrote: > My comments are prefixed with #####. I've been meaning to ask for a while why it is becoming so common for people to invent a variety of random quoting mechanisms rather than just using the > signs that have been the standard on the Internet for so long. My pattern matcher does not like being reconfigured for every one of the hundreds of messages I read every day. It seems to be an Outlook thing but isn't there a way to configure Outlook to conform to the standards that prevailed on the Internet before it even existed??? > ##### I called it "knowledge representation language" for a while. It > seemed very natural to shorten that to "KR". I don't think this has > caused a problem within the RDF-Interest group. The rest of my > comments will use "KR" to denote my language. Why not call it KRL? That's the natural acronym for a "Knowledge Representation Language". I have to agree with Joshua that I found this quite confusing for a while until I understood that you were using the acronym in a non-standard way. Paul Prescod
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 19:52:20 UTC