- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:48:33 -0700
- To: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@snee.com>
- cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, charles@w3.org
> I thought I'd seen somewhere -- and now not only can't I cite it, but I've also seen production [1] at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#basic -- that the rdf:RDF element is optional, and I had the impression that only ARP supported this, but now I realized that this is an extra feature of ARP not required by any RDF Recommendation. I disagree with the conclusion you draw. rdf:RDF is optional in the nrmative BNF, so I think parser should consider it optional. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com A Python & XML Companion - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/12/11/py-xml.html XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965 MusicBrainz metadata - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi nk14.html
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 15:08:08 UTC