- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:34:47 -0800
- To: "Patrick J. Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 13:34:54 UTC
I'm still not very fluent in RDFMT, so I'd appreciate your MT evaluation of the triple Resource Property Resource where Resource & Property are the RDF,RDFS Classes. For readability, I dropped the "rdf:", "rdfs:" qualifiers. I want to know because a. It's a simple way to specify the domain & range of properties, e.g. Resource Property Resource Resource comment Literal b. It permits you to associate properties with Classes (as opposed to Individuals). c. KR permits ("tabula rasa" proposition) Resource has Property = Resource ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done knowledge haspart proposition list
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 13:34:54 UTC