- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:03:31 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> From: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
> > From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> > I don't understand your paragraph. p is not a formula ... can never be
a
> > formula, in my view. Doesn't "p" just identify a node or represent a
> > resource? {p negation ~p} is a formula.
>
> I don't understand how p cannot be a formula. Primitive propositions are
> formulae, and they seem to be naturally represented by resources.
Ok, sorry, I was thinking about 'not' in the sense that the world is divided
into penutbutter and not penutbutter. Here is a graph that is more what we
are talking about:
http://robustai.net/mentography/negation_paradox.gif
> What is the connection between this and RDF? I don't see any, and the
> point of this discussion is representing logic in RDF.
I can write all of those graphs in RDF. For example Figure C is
<http://robustai.net/sailor/paradox.rdf>
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:ex="http://example.org/examples#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="">
<ex:negates rdf:resource=""/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
> Well, lots, including the fact that the arrows are not RDF statements, as
> they are more than triples.
Within one document, all the arrows are triples. To express multiple
formula, we need to use multiple RDF documents.
> Well the problem is that if you make this formula belong to pl:Falsity,
> then the rules of logic say that it must belong to pl:Truth, and the rules
> of logic also say that pl:Truth and pl:Falsity are disjoint. Similarly,
if
> you make it belong to pl:Truth, then the rules of logic say that it must
> belong to pl:Falsity. So no matter what you do, you get into a bind.
Yes, I agree. <http://robustai.net/sailor/paradox.rdf> is a paradox and
should excluded from all graphs that purports to be binarialy logical.
Seth Russell
http://robustai.net/sailor/
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 18:04:10 UTC