- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:03:31 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > From: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net> > > From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > > I don't understand your paragraph. p is not a formula ... can never be a > > formula, in my view. Doesn't "p" just identify a node or represent a > > resource? {p negation ~p} is a formula. > > I don't understand how p cannot be a formula. Primitive propositions are > formulae, and they seem to be naturally represented by resources. Ok, sorry, I was thinking about 'not' in the sense that the world is divided into penutbutter and not penutbutter. Here is a graph that is more what we are talking about: http://robustai.net/mentography/negation_paradox.gif > What is the connection between this and RDF? I don't see any, and the > point of this discussion is representing logic in RDF. I can write all of those graphs in RDF. For example Figure C is <http://robustai.net/sailor/paradox.rdf> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:ex="http://example.org/examples#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <ex:negates rdf:resource=""/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> > Well, lots, including the fact that the arrows are not RDF statements, as > they are more than triples. Within one document, all the arrows are triples. To express multiple formula, we need to use multiple RDF documents. > Well the problem is that if you make this formula belong to pl:Falsity, > then the rules of logic say that it must belong to pl:Truth, and the rules > of logic also say that pl:Truth and pl:Falsity are disjoint. Similarly, if > you make it belong to pl:Truth, then the rules of logic say that it must > belong to pl:Falsity. So no matter what you do, you get into a bind. Yes, I agree. <http://robustai.net/sailor/paradox.rdf> is a paradox and should excluded from all graphs that purports to be binarialy logical. Seth Russell http://robustai.net/sailor/
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 18:04:10 UTC