- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:52:34 -0400
- To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: thabing@uiuc.edu, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:11:20 +0100 > >>>"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" said: [...] > > ... I'm even > > interested in an XML Schema schema document for RDF/XML that only uses a > > fixed collection of properties. > > I think I've mentioned my work on that before. > > W3C XML Schemas for simple DC in RDF/XML > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2002/01/dcxml-xsd/ > > which has schemas, instance documents (separate) and links to the W3C > WXS validator checking that they work. But do these schemas validate exactly the possible RDF/XML documents that use only the DC properties? [...] > > > This seems a rather ugly solution to the problem with your schema. > > > Why should just that namespace be ignored? > > > > Perhaps because it is the XML Schema namespace? RDF/XML treats the XML > > namespace specially already. > > No, the XML specification treats attributes starting with "xml" > specially. RDF/XML as revised now uses the XML infoset and all > such namespace issues are handled by XML parsers. The above-infoset > mapping never sees such prefixes. Well, then, doesn't RDF/XML treat the XML namespace specially? Couldn't you even treat the XML Schema namespaces specially in a similar way by going to a PSV infoset (or whatever that is called)? [...] peter
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 10:52:47 UTC