- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:15:02 +0300
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Such an XML serialization of DOM would be highly redundant (same case with John Cowan's serialization of infosets @ xml-dev). Why not use markup directly as a literal value? Cheers, Manos > -----Original Message----- > From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny666@virgilio.it] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:56 PM > To: RDF-Interest > Subject: xml DOM as rdf > > > > Has anyone come up with a nice vocabulary for expressing DOM > information as > RDF? > > I'm sure someone will already have tackled this, and I've > tried to search, > but it's a non-starter in Google. > > What I imagine is decomposing the tree to triples using a > vocabulary like : > > xmlrdf:Element > xmlrdf:Attribute > > xmlrdf:parent > > xmlrdf:attributeName > xmlrdf:attributeValue > > Aside from this, any links to vocabulary lists/registries > would be greatly > appreciated. > > Cheers, > Danny. > > --- > Danny Ayers > <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> > > Idea maps for the Semantic Web > http://ideagraph.net > >
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 08:14:23 UTC