- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:07:17 -0700
- To: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net> > An internal one. We're developing an ontology for our internal data > structures. We have Groups of things, and I was trying to find an > efficient way to describe that. I think we have to have multiple > identical properties defined for a single object (instead of using a > Bag) for our ontologies to define everything we need. What do you mean by: "multiple identical properties defined for a single object" ? We have that right now: A r B. C r B. D r B. We even have multiple identical properties for a single *subject* like: A s B. A s C. A s D. But if you want : A q B. A q B. A q B. Then, alas, that we don't have that. Triples are unique within the document, you end up with just one triple {A q B}. Incidentally, why do you need any more than the second example {A s B. A s C. A s D.} to show that A is a member of three groups, and that some group can have multiple members ? Seth Russell http://robustai.net/sailor/
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 16:07:52 UTC