- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:28:55 -0700
- To: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Seth Ladd" <seth@brivo.net>
> User hasMembership Bag (content, content, content)
> into
> User hasMembership content.
> User hasMembership content.
> User hasMembership content.
> That would make programming against the model graph a lot simpler.
Problem is, i am told, this is not always the case. For example if {W
dc:creator (A, B)} then we cannot in good faith say that {W dc:creator A. W
dc:creator B.}. There are lots of relationships that simply do not
distribute over sequences; but ,OTOH, there are lots of relationships that
do. We discussed this in #rdfig the other day. Somebody suggested that we
need a new subClass of properties ... maybe call it DistributesOverBags
.... then we say
{hasMembership rdfs:subPropertyOf DistributesOverBags}
and your inferences should come out ok.
.... hmmm ... what namespace wants to claim such a term ?
Seth Russell
http://robustai.net/sailor/
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 13:29:28 UTC