W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2001

RE: RDF Core WG work on literals

From: Peter Crowther <peter.crowther@networkinference.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:29:39 +0100
Message-ID: <B6F03FDBA149CA41B6E9EB8A329EB12D05A7C2@vault.melandra.net>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> From: Narahari, Sateesh [mailto:Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com]
> But RDF is not XML and XML is not RDF. 
> Why enforce anything related to XML, into RDF model?

It's an interesting point, especially given that diagrams such as [1] tend
to depict RDF as a layer above XML.  Are these simply out of date now?  Has
RDF taken on an independent existence, and become just another stand-alone

		- Peter

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/Talks/1206-xml2k-tbl/slide10-0.html, and many
other places
Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 12:30:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:32 UTC