W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Bitzi File Metadata RDF Dump

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:11:56 +0100
Message-ID: <02cb01c146ae$75f61580$a8d993c3@y0r1d9>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> Unless one can define some form of bidirectional
> equivalence, mass prefix changes will cause grief
> to developers and users for years afterwards.

That's my arguement for using the TAG URI scheme [1]... although URLs
*work*, why do we have to use them when there are other possibly more
persistent schemes around? But it's not really much of an important point,
unless bitzi.org cannot guarantee the persistence of that URI in the medium
term. But anyway, I still think that bitprints are important enough a
building block to be "standardized" to some extent.


[1] http://www.taguri.org/

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 13:12:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:32 UTC