- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:44:07 +0100
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <aswartz@upclink.com>, <gojomo@bitzi.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > http://bitzi.com/lookup/3KIZIJB64XP3NCXAE4ISQZT3Q > > NCTF7VDNK5UNR8ZPQ5MFASNGVB5MISV7ESUS > > B2MN5R3IY2 > > I have to respectfully disagree with your recommendation here, > Aaron. And I am going to have to respectfully "kinda" disagree with you both. IMO, I think that registering a MIME type for the bitprint may be a better idea (and is very easy to do), and then one could use something like:- data:text/prs.bitprint,3KIZIJB64XP3NCXAE4ISQZT3QNCTF7V DNK5UNR8ZPQ5MFASNGVB5MISV7ESUSB2MN5R3IY2 Then again, I wouldn't have any particular objection to a new URN namespace, especially an informal one. I do agree with Patrick that due to the scope of the bitprints being in the interest of the Internet community in general, it would be improper to use HTTP space to identify them. Cheers, -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 12:07:36 UTC