W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Another argument for anonymous resources...

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:02:42 -0500 (EST)
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: rdf interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0103190656510.12685-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Jan Grant wrote:

> ...albeit a quiche-eating one. It occurred to me that there are some
> things that we shouldn't attempt to assign URIs to. In an ironic twist,
> here's a link to an example:
> 	http://home.earthlink.net/~thebadger/prisoner.html

Otherwise known as...

<wn:Person 	xmlns:wn="http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Person"
		foaf:prisonerCode="6" />

Yep, though there's no huge social difference between assigning a
number/ID as someone's "URI" versus relating them to a

A lot of what we want URIs to do for us, we can do with other forms of
identifying expression (typically built from URIs... :) so there's no
escape, even for things that don't have URIs...

Received on Monday, 19 March 2001 07:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:29 UTC