- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:53:02 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > Lee, what is the argument against naming every resource? > > If the idea of RDF is to let anyone talk about anything anywhere, then > so-called anonymous resources should be part of this too. > > Giving them IDs lets others join in the party, so to speak. Have a look at http://tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/~cmjg/rdf/discuss - there's some stuff in there aout anonymous resources. I've got an RDF implementation that (mostly) behaves like the discussion suggests it should. jan PS. Anonymous resources should definitely stay. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 05:55:47 UTC