- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 14:36:07 +0100
- To: seth@robustai.net
- Cc: GK@NineByNine.org, aswartz@upclink.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> > [Graham] > > Sooner or later, methinks, it is needed that statements are grounded in > > "real-world" knowledge. How do you suggest that such grounding may be > > introduced into a system? > > > > (I propose it is through axiomatic facts and inference rules.) > > [Seth] > I agree, it is needed. I propose that practical "real-world" knowledge is > grounded in the effective procedures of interacting active processes. > > Logic is great, but survival is better :) Mathematics provides methods for reasoning: for manipulating expressions, for providig properties from and about expressions, and for obtaining new results from known ones. This reasoning can be done without knowing or caring what the symbols being manipulating mean. [David Gries & Fred B. Schneider] Escaping into that space, and returning from it in a much better shape can be a very effective survival mechanism :-) -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2001 08:36:38 UTC