W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: TimBL: parseType="Resource" should be default

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 09:56:32 +0000
Message-ID: <3AA8A8D0.3735F76E@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
CC: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, timbl@w3.org, jborden@openhealth.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I'd like a little help with further characterizing this 'issue'.

1) Its not an issue, its a suggestion.  My failing brain cells failed
   to record what problem this was intended to solve.

2) If this is an issue, it seems to be with the interface to parsers,
which is
   more to do with the processing model and less with the syntax.  Is
this a
   suggestion for introducing a processing instruction?  Or was this a
   suggestion for a specific language construct?


Aaron Swartz wrote:
> Just archiving this issue for posterity.
> At the RDF IG F2F, Jonathan Borden(?) and TimBL felt that there should be
> some way of telling parsers to treat rdf:parseType="Resource" as the
> default. This would be a backwards-compatible addition to the XML syntax.
> --
> Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|           my.info
>   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |   <http://my.theinfo.org>
> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237|  the future of news, today
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 04:55:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:28 UTC