- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 09:02:39 -0600
- To: <lagoze@cs.cornell.edu>, <dc-architecture@jiscmail.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
lagoze@cs.cornell.edu <lagoze@cs.cornell.edu> wrote: > Perhaps your note reveals a hint at where our disagreements and > misunderstandings are. All of you examples are framed in terms of the > "agent elements". In that case your argument makes some sense, e.g., > the string "The Beatles" is the "human readable name" of that group. My > statements, however, are meant to apply to all DC elements. The methods > being discussed regarding default value are intended to be general. > Thus, the use of rdfs:label in the case of the subject element (picking > one example) seems pretty far from "a human readable version of a > resource name". The subject would make sense too (as I've shown before). The literal for: http://dir.yahoo.com/Computers/Internet/ would be "Internet". There are a few however that don't make sense, like Identifier (where the appropriate literal would be the resource name itself) for example and we've included those exceptions in the algorithm. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Monday, 5 March 2001 10:02:21 UTC