Saturday, 31 March 2001
- FW: bookmarks in LDAP - XUL template for RDF datasource result "blank" (xmatl@fi.muni.cz)
- Re: Representing the Differences Between two Models
- Re: Representing the Differences Between two Models
Friday, 30 March 2001
- ANNOUNCE: RDF Interest Group IRC channel, tools, logs: #rdfig
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: RDF binding, Java::IMS MD-Interoperability
- RDF binding, Java::IMS MD-Interoperability (fwd)
- CFP: Workshop on Ontologies at KI 2001
- RE: Attributes and Namespaces.
- Re: Semantic Web Mining
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- [PRISM] Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: Wordnet->RDFS->RDDL viewer
- Re: Attributes and Namespaces.
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
Thursday, 29 March 2001
- Re: [PRISM] Change due to unregistered URIs
- [PRISM] More comment dispositions
- [PRISM] RSS mention, other things from Aaron
- [PRISM] Change due to unregistered URIs
- RE: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RE: Attributes and Namespaces.
- RDF_PI
- Re: Attributes and Namespaces.
- Wordnet->RDFS->RDDL viewer
- Re: Attributes and Namespaces.
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RE: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RE: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RE: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
Wednesday, 28 March 2001
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RE: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RE: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- RDFSuite website announcement
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Representing the Differences Between two Models
- DAML+OIL (March 2001) released
- RE: Java DMOZ cleaner
Tuesday, 27 March 2001
- RE: Java DMOZ cleaner
- Re: Java DMOZ cleaner
- RE: Java DMOZ cleaner
- RE: Java DMOZ cleaner
- Re: Java DMOZ cleaner
- Re: Java DMOZ cleaner
- Attributes and Namespaces.
- Java DMOZ cleaner
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol
Monday, 26 March 2001
Sunday, 25 March 2001
Saturday, 24 March 2001
Friday, 23 March 2001
Monday, 26 March 2001
Sunday, 25 March 2001
Saturday, 24 March 2001
Friday, 23 March 2001
Wednesday, 21 March 2001
- Fw: ANNOUNCE: New web site for topic maps available
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New web site for topic maps available
- ANNOUNCE: New web site for topic maps available
Tuesday, 20 March 2001
- XML Schema: Formal Description is now published (fwd)
- RE: Another argument for anonymous resources...
- RDFPath mailing list
- RE: Another argument for anonymous resources...
Monday, 19 March 2001
- Re: Another argument for anonymous resources...
- Another argument for anonymous resources...
- Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab-20010315/
- TDDL an XHTML based version of RDF Schema
Sunday, 18 March 2001
Friday, 16 March 2001
- Re: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- RDF Parser Tests
- ANN: (Extended) DC DumbDown Demo
- Annotea has public pages
- RE: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- RE: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Querying and Transforming RDF
- RE: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Last Call Review Request: CC/PP
- RDF samples and miscellaneous tests
Thursday, 15 March 2001
- RE: Re: [RSS-DEV] Question: Can a RDF Class and a RDF Property ha ve the same name?
- Fwd: Re: [RSS-DEV] Question: Can a RDF Class and a RDF Property have the same name?
- RE: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Re: RDF calendar taskforce and use-cases
- Re: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Re: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Re: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Re: Question: Can a RDF Class and a RDF Property have the same name?
Wednesday, 14 March 2001
- RE: Question: Can a RDF Class and a RDF Property have the same na me?
- Question: Can a RDF Class and a RDF Property have the same name?
- Re: ANN: Swag Dictionary as seen by SethBot
- Re: ANN: Swag Dictionary as seen by SethBot
- ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Modeller - Modelling RDF graphs graphically
- PRISM March 5, 2001 Last Call Draft Comments
- Re: ANN: Swag Dictionary as seen by SethBot
- Re: Weights and Measures
- RE: RDF calendar taskforce and use-cases
Tuesday, 13 March 2001
- ANN: Swag Dictionary as seen by SethBot
- Re: Jena: Implementing the RDF M&S Specification
- RE: Weights and Measures
- Re: Weights and Measures
- Re: Problem with the list?
- Re: RDF calendar taskforce and use-cases
- RE: Weights and Measures
- RE: Weights and Measures
- Weights and Measures
- Re: Problem with the list?
- Re: Problem with the list?
- RE: quick review of the PRISM spec
- Re: Problem with the list?
- Re: Problem with the list?
- Re: Problem with the list?
- Re: Problem with the list?
- RE: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Problem with the list?
- Problem with the list?
Monday, 12 March 2001
- RDF, Query Languages and XML DevCon
- Re: TM + RDF was Re: Again: Anonymous Resources and literals
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: TM + RDF was Re: Again: Anonymous Resources and literals
- GET and POST RDF with HTML forms
- TM + RDF was Re: Again: Anonymous Resources and literals
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources and literals
- RE: Article: SW = ( SM + SC )
- Graphs and linear (serial) forms
- [www-rdf-interest] <none>
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- CFP: International Symposium of Visualisation of the Semantic Web (IV2001-VSW)
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
Sunday, 11 March 2001
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: quick review of the PRISM spec
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: How are statements grounded ?
- RE: RDF in HTML pages
- Re: How are statements grounded ?
- How are statements grounded ?
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
Saturday, 10 March 2001
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
Monday, 22 January 2001
Wednesday, 24 January 2001
Saturday, 10 March 2001
Friday, 9 March 2001
- Re: TimBL: parseType="Resource" should be default
- Re: Proposed UML Interest Group
- Re: RDF in HTML pages
- Re: Proposed UML Interest Group
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: RDF in HTML pages
- Re: RDF in HTML pages
- Proposed UML Interest Group
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RE: RDF in HTML pages
- Re: RDF in HTML pages
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: RDF calendar taskforce and use-cases
- Re: TimBL: parseType="Resource" should be default
- RE: RDF in HTML pages
- Re: RDF in HTML pages
- Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
Thursday, 8 March 2001
- Re: Siganture Assurance Profile
- RDF calendar taskforce and use-cases
- Re: quick review of the PRISM spec
- Re: URI Implementations
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- quick review of the PRISM spec
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: Again: Anonymous Resources
- Naive approach to representing XTM 1.0 as RDF
- RE: Again: Anonymous Resources
- RDF in HTML pages
- Jena: Implementing the RDF M&S Specification
- Re: expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI )
- Again: Anonymous Resources
- Re: URI Implementations
- Re: URI Implementations
- Naive approach to representing XTM 1.0 as RDF
- Re: URI Implementations
Wednesday, 7 March 2001
- URI Implementations
- Re: expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI )
- Naive approach to representing XTM 1.0 as RD
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Siganture Assurance Profile
- Re: expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI )
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- 37 SOAP 1.1 implementations (fwd)
- [ANN] last call for reviews of PRISM metadata spec
- RE: RDF Triples Transport
- RDF calendar taskforce and use-cases
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- RE: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI )
- RE: Use/misuse of RDF:Value
- Last CFP: Agents 2001 Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems
- expressing scope of negation of failure (wasRe: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI )
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- Re: RDF Triples Transport
- RDF Triples Transport
Tuesday, 6 March 2001
Monday, 5 March 2001
- Re: about literals
- about literals
- ANN: note on information modelling in RDF
- Re: Use/misuse of RDF:Value
- Re: [Moderator Action] Could you pl tell me
- Final CFP: WI-2001 (Web Intelligence)
- RE: Use/misuse of RDF:Value
Sunday, 4 March 2001
Saturday, 3 March 2001
Friday, 2 March 2001
- Re: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI
- Getting RDF N3 From HyperText
- A QUESTION about Legal XML/RDF
- RE: Dropping the redundant colon in N3
- Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3
- Re: Open Worlds, Distribution, Delegation, Federation, Logic, NI
- RE: Dropping the redundant colon in N3
- Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3
- Final CFP: IAT-2001
- Re: Dropping the redundant colon in N3
- CFP: International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation - CIMCA'2001