- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 05:56:47 -0700
- To: "Sampo Syreeni" <decoy@iki.fi>, "Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN" <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Sampo Syreeni" <decoy@iki.fi> > Probably. But once people start thinking about URLs as URNs, and abandon the > effort that has gone to resolving generic URNs as opposed to the ease we can > deal with URLs, I think the URN effort dies a horrible death. I think that > URLs and URNs are two different things, neither of which is becoming > obsolete very soon. On the contrary, people should work to get URN > resolution working. Huh? I thought that URNs were designed to be names and only names. If we attach a global resolution meaning to names then we will have URLs. Me thinks a name should resolve to what it identifies only in the memory of an agent hearing or speaking the name. Seth
Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 09:05:49 UTC