- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:41:45 +0300
- To: champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr, sean@mysterylights.com
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Please see my recent posting of a proposed solution to this very problem -- i.e. the mapping between namespace qualified names and semantics. Cheers, Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN [mailto:champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr] > Sent: 11 June, 2001 12:13 > To: Sean "B." Palmer > Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Re: What is the URI of Truth? > > > On 08 Jun 2001 17:31:25 +0100, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > > I don't particularly agree that it is a > > critical apect of the SW to be able to define non-ambiguous > interplay > > between different namespacing mechanisms, > > I'm not sure I get your point here: > You seem to distinguish XML-namespaces from RDF-namespaces. > > I do not know what *a* RDF-namespace is : RDF only knows of *one* > namespace : URIs. > > A problem with XML-namespaces is that are not part of the > URI-space, but > rather of the a space which elements are <uri, xml-name> pairs. Hence > the mapping-by-concatenation issue. > This problem is proper to the RDF 1.0 XML syntax, because it needs to > convert Qnames to URIs. I agree it is not critical to the SW. > > Another problem with XML-namespaces is that, in current > practice, their > is a semantical ambiguity with the URI identifying them (can an http: > URI identify a namespace ?). > This problem, IMHO, is critical in many respects, since it raises > questions about the semantics of URIs. There is no "interplay between > different namespacing mechanisms" as you wrote: URIs are the global > namespace of the SW. > > Pierre-Antoine > >
Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 06:41:56 UTC