- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 08:15:03 -0500
- To: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk> wrote: > A third way, as I said in another mail, is to move away from saying RDF > describes RDF 'resources' to saying RDF describes (RFC2396) resources by > their Referents. Then define 'Referent' to be "That part or view of a > resource which MAY be referred to by a URI reference", and delegate > definitions of resources, URIs, URI references, etc. to RFC2396. But that doesn't help much -- the only difference is we're stuck defining referent instead of redefining resource. And we're _still_ redefining resources, because we now say that they have parts and views. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 09:16:34 UTC