"Sean B. Palmer" wrote: > > [1] http://robustai.net/~seth/index.htm > > [2] http://robustai.net/~seth/index.htm#Truth > > O.K., TimBL has actually argued against using URLs as in [1] for > concepts, because they do represent retrievable entities according to > the HTTP specification. Do you have a reference for Tim's "argument"? In a similar thread on the URI list not too long ago, Dan Conolly argued (quite strongly) in favor of using HTTP URLs for non-retrievable entities. I assume that Dan's thinking would be aligned with Tim's? Maybe there's an actual W3C position on this, somewhere? I've given up trying to get through all the messages on this thread, but I sure would like to see it resolved one way or the other. --Ray -- Ray Denenberg Library of Congress rden@loc.gov 202-707-5795
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2001 10:11:52 UTC