- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:52:04 +0300
- To: sean@mysterylights.com, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Cc: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
> Except that tags are unique throughout space and time, and HRNs are > only unique troughout space? If you added some sort of time field to > an HRN, then you'd have a tag, more or less. For some applicatoins, I could see temporal uniqueness as useful, but for identifying e.g. the ISO defined identifier for the language "Swahili", I would hope it would not need such a mechanism ;-) It seems that tags are intended simply to be non-mnemmonic, non-semantic bearing unique IDs. That's not what HRNs (or URNs) are meant to be, IMO (so to that end, I agree that tags should not be URNs...) Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 3 356 0209 Senior Research Scientist Mobile: +358 50 483 9453 Software Technology Laboratory Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Video: +358 3 356 0209 / 4227 Visiokatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 10:52:13 UTC