- From: dehora <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:29:15 +0100
- To: "Lee Jonas" <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>, "'Brian McBride'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 10:33:04 UTC
: Lee: : : >>Rather than shoehorn the notion of 'resource' into what the RDF M&S spec : >>requires as a primary building block, you could turn the problem around and : >>define RDF M&S in the existing terms of RFC2396. : : Brian: : : >What you suggest is a change to the RDF formal model. I don't think it : >can be considered just an editorial fix. : > Lee, Brian, You'll find one approach to sub-editing the M&S below: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0117.html> How far one can do this without altering the meaning and intent of the paragraph is a matter of debate. IMO (which is distinct from the O of the wg) it's a reasonable approach given the scope of the wg charter. regards, Bill ---- Bill de hOra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 10:33:04 UTC