- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:07:04 -0800
- To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- CC: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Graham Klyne wrote: > I think it is possible to achieve this effect without requiring an explicit > indication that the node is a "variable", although I think there is a need > to indicate the scope withi which the value/name bindings associated with a > node may be applicable. Well maybe its not even a variable; but the fact that the node is an :Unknown must be explicitly asserted. Let's factor all the particulars out of the equation and see what's left: :Seth :isLookingFor [ a :Unknown]. That is the intent of the message, I won't let you just lop it off. :Seth :mustGoTo :Work
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 18:00:19 UTC